COVID In Pregnancy Triples Baby's Odds for Respiratory Illness

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on Jan 24, 2024.

By Dennis Thompson HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, Jan. 24, 2024 -- Babies born to COVID-infected mothers have triple the risk of developing a breathing disorder that normally affects preemies, a new study shows.

Researchers found that exposure to the coronavirus while in the womb increased a newborn’s risk of respiratory distress syndrome by sparking an “inflammatory cascade” in the infants that affected their breathing.

“We found unusually high rates of respiratory distress shortly after birth in the full-term babies born to mothers who had COVID-19 during pregnancy,” senior study author Dr. Karin Nielsen, a professor of pediatrics in the division of pediatric infectious diseases at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, said in a university news release.

The research team also found that the risk was significantly lower if moms infected during pregnancy had been vaccinated, according to findings published Jan. 24 in the journal Nature Communications.

Respiratory distress syndrome most commonly afflicts premature babies born with underdeveloped lungs, according to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

Babies with the syndrome breathe rapidly and struggle to catch their breath. They also can have blue coloring, flaring of the nostrils and make grunting sounds while breathing.

For the new study, researchers enrolled 221 mothers, of whom 68% were unvaccinated prior to infection. All babies included in the study were born at full term.

Severe COVID infections occurred in 23 of the unvaccinated mothers, compared to 3 vaccinated moms.

Researchers found that 17% of 199 infants exposed to COVID in the womb developed respiratory distress – far higher than the 5% to 6% of babies that typically suffer respiratory distress in the general population.

About 21% of babies with respiratory distress were born to moms who had severe COVID, while only 6% of babies without respiratory distress had been exposed to severe COVID.

Researchers also found more cases of respiratory distress at later ages than expected in the infants, when their lungs should have developed enough to minimize their risk.

Of the 34 infants with respiratory distress, only five were born to moms vaccinated prior to infection, results show.

On the other hand, 63 babies born to vaccinated moms didn’t have the breathing disorder, indicating that vaccination protected their lungs.

Researchers said even a single dose of mRNA COVID vaccine prior to infection significantly reduced the risk that a full-term infant would develop respiratory distress.

Researchers also came up with a potential reason why COVID might increase this risk.

In the lab, they observed that whip-like hairs called motile cilia that help clear mucus from the respiratory tract did not function normally in babies with respiratory distress linked to COVID exposure.

The babies also had higher levels of immunoglobulin E, an antibody linked to allergic response.

Sources

  • UCLA, news release, Jan. 24, 2024
  • Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

    Source: HealthDay

    Read more

    Disclaimer

    Every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided by Drugslib.com is accurate, up-to-date, and complete, but no guarantee is made to that effect. Drug information contained herein may be time sensitive. Drugslib.com information has been compiled for use by healthcare practitioners and consumers in the United States and therefore Drugslib.com does not warrant that uses outside of the United States are appropriate, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Drugslib.com's drug information does not endorse drugs, diagnose patients or recommend therapy. Drugslib.com's drug information is an informational resource designed to assist licensed healthcare practitioners in caring for their patients and/or to serve consumers viewing this service as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, the expertise, skill, knowledge and judgment of healthcare practitioners.

    The absence of a warning for a given drug or drug combination in no way should be construed to indicate that the drug or drug combination is safe, effective or appropriate for any given patient. Drugslib.com does not assume any responsibility for any aspect of healthcare administered with the aid of information Drugslib.com provides. The information contained herein is not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. If you have questions about the drugs you are taking, check with your doctor, nurse or pharmacist.

    Popular Keywords