ER Visits for Burns, Eye Issues Rose 8-Fold During Recent L.A. Fires

Follow Drugslib on

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on Feb 7, 2025.

By Ernie Mundell HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, Feb. 7, 2025 -- Los Angeles County residents are still recovering from the devastation of the Palisades and Eaton fires, and new data show that emergency department (ED) visits for wildfire-related issues jumped eight-fold in the days after the fires broke out.

In fact, the new data "likely underestimate the prevalence of wildfire-associated ED encounters," a team led by Emily Kajita of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (LACDPH) concludes.

Fueled by bone-dry conditions and winds reaching gusts of 100 mph, the Palisades and Eaton fires roared through tens of thousands of acres, destroying more than 16,000 structures and killing 29 people.

The fires took weeks to put out completely and dirtied the air Los Angelenos breathed during that time.

Kajita and colleagues looked at LACDPH data on ED encounters occurring in 90% of hospitals across the county.

Overall, ED visits actually dropped by 9% in the first six days after the fires broke out, compared to the three weeks prior.

The researchers note that this is in keeping with ED trends during natural disasters generally, as people focus more on moving away from affected areas; schools and businesses are shut down; and many folks take added precautions around their health.

However, between Jan. 7 and 12 there was a sharp spike in ED encounters for illnesses and injuries linked directly to the fires.

Rates for these visits spiked eight-fold, from 0.06% of encounters before the blazes began to 0.52% of visits, peaking at 1% of ED encounters on Jan. 8, the data showed.

Most of these wildfire-related visits involved burns or eye-related symptoms.

There was no notable increase during the six-day period in ED encounters for heart- or asthma-related issues, as has been seen during wildfire events occurring elsewhere, Kajita's group noted.

That might be due to the fact that the county was already deep into "peak" viral illness season, so added encounters for respiratory issues might have been masked by that seasonal trend. These and other factors may have led to an underestimation of true ED visits prompted by the wildfires, they said.

The findings offer lessons on how to better prepare for future fire events, the team said.

"Sharing communications with the general public about the importance of minimizing exposures to wildfire smoke, especially during the first few days of wildfire events" could ease the impact of such disasters on public health, the researchers said.

The findings were published Feb. 6 in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, a journal of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Sources

  • Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Feb. 6, 2025

    • Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

    Source: HealthDay

    Posted : 2025-02-08 00:00

    Read more

    Disclaimer

    Every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided by Drugslib.com is accurate, up-to-date, and complete, but no guarantee is made to that effect. Drug information contained herein may be time sensitive. Drugslib.com information has been compiled for use by healthcare practitioners and consumers in the United States and therefore Drugslib.com does not warrant that uses outside of the United States are appropriate, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Drugslib.com's drug information does not endorse drugs, diagnose patients or recommend therapy. Drugslib.com's drug information is an informational resource designed to assist licensed healthcare practitioners in caring for their patients and/or to serve consumers viewing this service as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, the expertise, skill, knowledge and judgment of healthcare practitioners.

    The absence of a warning for a given drug or drug combination in no way should be construed to indicate that the drug or drug combination is safe, effective or appropriate for any given patient. Drugslib.com does not assume any responsibility for any aspect of healthcare administered with the aid of information Drugslib.com provides. The information contained herein is not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. If you have questions about the drugs you are taking, check with your doctor, nurse or pharmacist.

    Popular Keywords