Methotrexate Noninferior to Prednisone in Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on May 20, 2025.

By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, May 20, 2025 -- For patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis, methotrexate is noninferior to prednisone with regard to the change from baseline to week 24 in the percentage of the predicted forced vital capacity (FVC), according to a study published online May 18 in the New England Journal of Medicine to coincide with the American Thoracic Society 2025 International Conference, held from May 18 to 21 in San Francisco.

Vivienne Kahlmann, M.D., from Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, Netherlands, and colleagues conducted a multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial involving patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis who had not previously received treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either prednisone or methotrexate according to a prespecified treatment schedule (70 and 68 participants, respectively). The primary end point was the mean change in the percentage of the predicted FVC from baseline to week 24.

The researchers found that the unadjusted mean change in the percentage of FVC from baseline to week 24 was 6.75 and 6.11 percentage points in the prednisone and methotrexate groups, respectively. With respect to the primary end point, methotrexate was noninferior to prednisone, with an adjusted between-group difference of −1.17 percentage points (95 percent confidence interval, −4.27 to 1.93). In the two trial groups, adverse events occurred in a similar percentage of patients.

"The results of this trial show that methotrexate can be offered as an alternative for prednisone for patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis," Kahlmann said in a statement. "Some patients prioritize fast improvement of symptoms and are less afraid of side effects, while other patients may want to wait longer for treatment effects if this means they can avoid steroid toxicity."

Several authors disclosed ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)

More Information

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

Source: HealthDay

Read more

Disclaimer

Every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided by Drugslib.com is accurate, up-to-date, and complete, but no guarantee is made to that effect. Drug information contained herein may be time sensitive. Drugslib.com information has been compiled for use by healthcare practitioners and consumers in the United States and therefore Drugslib.com does not warrant that uses outside of the United States are appropriate, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Drugslib.com's drug information does not endorse drugs, diagnose patients or recommend therapy. Drugslib.com's drug information is an informational resource designed to assist licensed healthcare practitioners in caring for their patients and/or to serve consumers viewing this service as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, the expertise, skill, knowledge and judgment of healthcare practitioners.

The absence of a warning for a given drug or drug combination in no way should be construed to indicate that the drug or drug combination is safe, effective or appropriate for any given patient. Drugslib.com does not assume any responsibility for any aspect of healthcare administered with the aid of information Drugslib.com provides. The information contained herein is not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. If you have questions about the drugs you are taking, check with your doctor, nurse or pharmacist.

Popular Keywords