Posterior Surgery Noninferior to Anterior for Cervical Radiculopathy

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on Aug 12, 2024.

By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Aug. 12, 2024 -- For patients with cervical radiculopathy, posterior surgery is noninferior to anterior surgery with respect to success rate and reduction in arm pain, according to a study published online July 24 in the Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Nadia F. Simões de Souza, M.D., from the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, and colleagues conducted a multicenter, noninferiority trial involving patients with single-level cervical radiculopathy in nine Dutch hospitals with two-year follow-up duration. A total of 265 patients were randomly assigned: 132 and 133 to the posterior surgery group (posterior cervical foraminotomy) and anterior surgery group (anterior discectomy with fusion), respectively. Primary outcome data were available for 236 of the 243 patients who underwent the allocated intervention.

The researchers found that the predicted proportions of a successful outcome were 0.81 and 0.74 after posterior and anterior surgery, respectively (difference in rate, −0.06 [one-sided 95 percent confidence interval, −0.02]), indicating noninferiority of the posterior group. The difference in arm pain between the groups was −2.7 (one-sided 95 percent confidence interval, 7.4), and the between-group difference in the decrease in arm pain was 1.5 (one-sided 95 percent confidence interval, 8.2), confirming noninferiority. Small between-group differences were seen in secondary outcomes. Overall, 8 and 9 percent of patients who underwent posterior and anterior surgery, respectively, had serious surgery-related adverse events (difference, −0.02; two-sided 95 percent confidence interval, −0.09 to 0.05).

"Our findings provide level-I evidence that posterior surgery is noninferior to anterior surgery with regard to the clinical outcome, with follow-up of two years," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed ties to the pharmaceutical and medical device industries.

Abstract/Full Text

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

Source: HealthDay

Read more

Disclaimer

Every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided by Drugslib.com is accurate, up-to-date, and complete, but no guarantee is made to that effect. Drug information contained herein may be time sensitive. Drugslib.com information has been compiled for use by healthcare practitioners and consumers in the United States and therefore Drugslib.com does not warrant that uses outside of the United States are appropriate, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Drugslib.com's drug information does not endorse drugs, diagnose patients or recommend therapy. Drugslib.com's drug information is an informational resource designed to assist licensed healthcare practitioners in caring for their patients and/or to serve consumers viewing this service as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, the expertise, skill, knowledge and judgment of healthcare practitioners.

The absence of a warning for a given drug or drug combination in no way should be construed to indicate that the drug or drug combination is safe, effective or appropriate for any given patient. Drugslib.com does not assume any responsibility for any aspect of healthcare administered with the aid of information Drugslib.com provides. The information contained herein is not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. If you have questions about the drugs you are taking, check with your doctor, nurse or pharmacist.

Popular Keywords