Risk-Reducing Mastectomy Cost-Effective With Breast Cancer Risk ≥35 Percent

Follow Drugslib on

By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on July 28, 2025.

via HealthDay

MONDAY, July 28, 2025 -- Undergoing risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) seems to be cost-effective for women aged 30 to 55 years with a lifetime breast cancer (BC) risk of 35 percent or higher, according to a study published online July 24 in JAMA Oncology.

Xia Wei, Ph.D., from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, and colleagues defined lifetime BC risk thresholds for RRM in an economic evaluation using a decision-analytic Markov model. The cost-effectiveness of RRM was compared to BC screening and medical prevention (tamoxifen or anastrozole) in a simulated cohort.

In the simulated cohort of 100,000 30-year-old women, the researchers found that RRM became cost-effective at a 34 percent lifetime BC risk using the £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and compared with the U.K. willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. The identified lifetime BC risk thresholds for RRM to be cost-effective were 31, 29, 29, 32, 36, and 42 percent among women aged 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 years, respectively, using the £30,000 per QALY WTP threshold. For women aged 30 to 55 years with a lifetime BC risk of at least 35 percent, undergoing RRM was deemed cost-effective, with more than 50 percent of simulations cost-effective in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. For women with a lifetime BC risk of 35 percent or higher, offering RRM could potentially prevent approximately 6,538 BCs or about 11 percent of the 58,756 BC cases occurring annually among women in the United Kingdom.

"The results could have significant clinical implications to expand access to RRM beyond BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 pathogenic variant carriers, and could potentially prevent 6,500 BC cases annually," the authors write. "Future studies evaluating the acceptability, uptake, and long-term impact of RRM among these women are needed."

One author disclosed ties to the biopharmaceutical industry.

Abstract/Full Text

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

Source: HealthDay

Posted : 2025-07-29 06:00

Read more

Disclaimer

Every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided by Drugslib.com is accurate, up-to-date, and complete, but no guarantee is made to that effect. Drug information contained herein may be time sensitive. Drugslib.com information has been compiled for use by healthcare practitioners and consumers in the United States and therefore Drugslib.com does not warrant that uses outside of the United States are appropriate, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Drugslib.com's drug information does not endorse drugs, diagnose patients or recommend therapy. Drugslib.com's drug information is an informational resource designed to assist licensed healthcare practitioners in caring for their patients and/or to serve consumers viewing this service as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, the expertise, skill, knowledge and judgment of healthcare practitioners.

The absence of a warning for a given drug or drug combination in no way should be construed to indicate that the drug or drug combination is safe, effective or appropriate for any given patient. Drugslib.com does not assume any responsibility for any aspect of healthcare administered with the aid of information Drugslib.com provides. The information contained herein is not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. If you have questions about the drugs you are taking, check with your doctor, nurse or pharmacist.

Popular Keywords