SIR: Minimally Invasive Prostate Cancer Treatment Shows Faster Recovery Than Robotic Prostatectomy

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, Senior Medical Editor, B. Pharm. Last updated on April 20, 2026.

via HealthDay

MONDAY, April 20, 2026 -- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) shows better initial perioperative outcomes than robotic prostatectomy (RP) for intermediate-risk prostate cancer, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Interventional Radiology, held from April 11 to 15 in Toronto.

David A. Woodrum, M.D., Ph.D., from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and colleagues examined baseline patient and treatment characteristics, as well as initial perioperative outcomes and return-to-baseline activity among participants in the CAPTAIN randomized controlled trial comparing TULSA (148 individuals) to RP (64 individuals) for localized, intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

The researchers found that for TULSA versus RP, median age was 63 versus 65 years; the prostate-specific antigen level was 6.5 versus 7.2 ng/mL; and prostate volume was 41 versus 35 cc. Prostate calcifications were absent, ≤3 mm, and >3 mm in 64, 19, and 17 percent of participants, respectively, versus 67, 22, and 11 percent of participants. Grade group 2/3 histology was seen in 76 and 24 percent of TULSA patients versus 77 and 23 percent of RP patients. Most TULSA plans were designed for subtotal ablation with strategic sparing; median fraction of the prostate heated to ablative temperatures measured by intraprocedural MRI thermometry was 78 percent. More than three-quarters of RP participants (77 percent) had pelvic lymph node dissection. TULSA had significantly less intraprocedural blood loss than RP (0 versus 100 mL) and shorter length of stay (0.29 versus 1.24 days). With TULSA, catheterization was longer (13 versus eight days). After TULSA, patients reported significantly less decline in overall health on the EQ-5D 0-100 visual analog scale for all 30 days versus RP.

"Initial perioperative outcomes demonstrate that TULSA had no blood loss, no overnight stay, reduced post-procedure pain, and faster recovery to baseline activities and overall health compared to RP," the authors write.

Abstract

Press Release

More Information

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

Source: HealthDay

Read more

Disclaimer

Every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided by Drugslib.com is accurate, up-to-date, and complete, but no guarantee is made to that effect. Drug information contained herein may be time sensitive. Drugslib.com information has been compiled for use by healthcare practitioners and consumers in the United States and therefore Drugslib.com does not warrant that uses outside of the United States are appropriate, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Drugslib.com's drug information does not endorse drugs, diagnose patients or recommend therapy. Drugslib.com's drug information is an informational resource designed to assist licensed healthcare practitioners in caring for their patients and/or to serve consumers viewing this service as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, the expertise, skill, knowledge and judgment of healthcare practitioners.

The absence of a warning for a given drug or drug combination in no way should be construed to indicate that the drug or drug combination is safe, effective or appropriate for any given patient. Drugslib.com does not assume any responsibility for any aspect of healthcare administered with the aid of information Drugslib.com provides. The information contained herein is not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. If you have questions about the drugs you are taking, check with your doctor, nurse or pharmacist.

Popular Keywords