Supreme Court Blocks Colorado Limits on Therapy for LGBTQ Minors

Follow Drugslib on

By HealthDay Staff HealthDay Reporter

Amazon Big Spring Sale - Up to 40% off

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on April 1, 2026.

via HealthDay

WEDNESDAY, April 1, 2026 — The U.S. Supreme Court has blocked a Colorado law that forbid mental health professionals from trying to change LGBTQ minors’ sexual orientation.

In an 8-1 ruling, the court said the law violated free speech protections by limiting what therapists can say during sessions.

The case was brought by a Christian therapist who argued the law prevented her from helping clients explore personal goals tied to their faith.

Writing for the majority, Justice Neil Gorsuch said the law put limits on speech based on point of view.

“Colorado may regard its policy as essential to public health and safety,” he wrote. “But the First Amendment stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country.”

Colorado’s law, passed in 2019, banned licensed professionals from using therapy to try to change a minor’s sexual orientation or gender identity.

While they can be fined up to $5,000 for each violation and their license can be suspended or revoked, state officials have never enforced the measure. Religious entities are exempt.

In his ruling, Gorsuch said the law not only bans physical interventions, but also "censors speech based on viewpoint."

Supporters said the law was meant to protect young people from practices known as "conversion therapy," which critics say can be harmful and ineffective.

Conversion therapy encourages gay or lesbian youth to identify as heterosexual and for transgender children to identify as the gender they were assigned at birth.

More than 20 states have similar laws, The New York Times reported.

The ruling raises new questions about how states can regulate mental health care for young people.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the only member of the court who dissented, warned that the decision could have serious consequences.

“This decision might make speech-only therapies and other medical treatments involving practitioner speech effectively unregulatable,” she wrote.

She added that the long-term effects could be "catastrophic" if states cannot step in to protect patients from certain language from therapists.

Experts say the ruling may affect laws in other states that restrict similar practices.

It also adds to fire to more recent rulings in which the court has sided with arguments based on free speech and religious rights.

At the same time, officials argued that these types of laws are part of their role in regulating medical care.

Sources

  • The New York Times, March 31, 2026

    • Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

    Source: HealthDay

    Posted : 2026-04-02 01:56

    Read more

    Disclaimer

    Every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided by Drugslib.com is accurate, up-to-date, and complete, but no guarantee is made to that effect. Drug information contained herein may be time sensitive. Drugslib.com information has been compiled for use by healthcare practitioners and consumers in the United States and therefore Drugslib.com does not warrant that uses outside of the United States are appropriate, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Drugslib.com's drug information does not endorse drugs, diagnose patients or recommend therapy. Drugslib.com's drug information is an informational resource designed to assist licensed healthcare practitioners in caring for their patients and/or to serve consumers viewing this service as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, the expertise, skill, knowledge and judgment of healthcare practitioners.

    The absence of a warning for a given drug or drug combination in no way should be construed to indicate that the drug or drug combination is safe, effective or appropriate for any given patient. Drugslib.com does not assume any responsibility for any aspect of healthcare administered with the aid of information Drugslib.com provides. The information contained herein is not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. If you have questions about the drugs you are taking, check with your doctor, nurse or pharmacist.

    Popular Keywords