Updated Guidelines Issued for Assessing Prosthetic Heart Valves

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on Jan 16, 2024.

By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, Jan. 16, 2024 -- In guidelines issued by the American Society of Echocardiography and published online in the January issue of the Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, updated recommendations are presented for evaluating prosthetic valve function in patients with prosthetic heart valves (PHVs).

William A. Zoghbi, M.D., from Houston Methodist Hospital, and colleagues noted that for initial evaluation and management of PHVs, echocardiography is the modality of choice. To assess valve structure and function, a comprehensive approach is needed. For evaluating prosthetic valve function and related complications, color and spectral Doppler play a central role. Assessment of prosthetic valve function is more challenging than native valves due to suboptimal visualization of prosthetic valve structure and occluder devices with transthoracic echocardiography and the inherent variability of valve hemodynamics and orifice areas seen with the wide range of prosthetic valve types and sizes.

Advanced imaging is often needed in patients with suspected prosthetic valvular dysfunction to identify the mechanism of dysfunction or severity of regurgitation. Computed tomography (CT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) have emerged as powerful imaging modalities that complement echocardiography in addition to the traditional role of two-dimensional and three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography for assessing valve dysfunction. CT offers high-resolution imaging with a specific advantage in mechanical valves; the main strength of CMR is quantitation of the severity of regurgitation.

"This new guideline on prosthetic valves was very much needed, as the field has changed so much since 2009, with the introduction of percutaneous valves and improvements in 3D echocardiography and multimodality imaging," Zoghbi said in a statement.

Several authors disclosed ties to the pharmaceutical and medical device industries.

Abstract/Full Text

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

Source: HealthDay

Read more

Disclaimer

Every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided by Drugslib.com is accurate, up-to-date, and complete, but no guarantee is made to that effect. Drug information contained herein may be time sensitive. Drugslib.com information has been compiled for use by healthcare practitioners and consumers in the United States and therefore Drugslib.com does not warrant that uses outside of the United States are appropriate, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Drugslib.com's drug information does not endorse drugs, diagnose patients or recommend therapy. Drugslib.com's drug information is an informational resource designed to assist licensed healthcare practitioners in caring for their patients and/or to serve consumers viewing this service as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, the expertise, skill, knowledge and judgment of healthcare practitioners.

The absence of a warning for a given drug or drug combination in no way should be construed to indicate that the drug or drug combination is safe, effective or appropriate for any given patient. Drugslib.com does not assume any responsibility for any aspect of healthcare administered with the aid of information Drugslib.com provides. The information contained herein is not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. If you have questions about the drugs you are taking, check with your doctor, nurse or pharmacist.

Popular Keywords