USPSTF Guidelines of Little Value for Estimating Preeclampsia Risk in Those at Moderate Risk

Follow Drugslib on

By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on July 23, 2025.

via HealthDay

WEDNESDAY, July 23, 2025 -- Moderate U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) preeclampsia risk factors have little value for estimating the risk for preeclampsia, according to a study published online July 17 in JAMA Network Open.

Thomas F. McElrath, M.D., Ph.D., from Brigham & Women's Hospital in Boston, and colleagues examined which characteristics in the USPSTF guidelines on preeclampsia risk assessment accurately estimate preeclampsia risk status and the association of preeclampsia risk with aspirin prophylaxis (AP) in an observational cohort study involving pregnant participants aged 18 years or older with a singleton pregnancy less than 22 weeks' gestation.

Overall, 88.8 percent of 5,684 participants had an increased risk for preeclampsia (70.3 percent at moderate risk; 18.5 percent at high risk). The researchers found that 43.1 percent of participants received an AP recommendation. The overall rate of preeclampsia was 12.1 percent; rates were 3.0, 10.5, and 23.5 percent for those at low, moderate, and high risk, respectively, according to USPSTF categories. Nulliparity was associated with an increased risk for preeclampsia, and advanced maternal age was associated with a reduced risk among those with two or more moderate risk factors, but no high risk factors (relative risks, 1.48 and 0.79, respectively); no associations were seen for obesity or Black race. Overall, 82.0 percent of participants with any high risk factors were recommended AP, while 85.9 percent of those at low risk were not recommended AP. In contrast, 23.8 and 50.4 percent of those with one and two or more moderate risk factors, respectively, were recommended AP.

"Moderate risk factors, in the absence of high risk factors, had no or low value for estimating the risk of developing preeclampsia, leading to nonspecific recommendation of AP in the moderate-risk category," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed ties to the pharmaceutical and medical technology industries.

Abstract/Full Text

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

Source: HealthDay

Posted : 2025-07-24 06:00

Read more

Disclaimer

Every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided by Drugslib.com is accurate, up-to-date, and complete, but no guarantee is made to that effect. Drug information contained herein may be time sensitive. Drugslib.com information has been compiled for use by healthcare practitioners and consumers in the United States and therefore Drugslib.com does not warrant that uses outside of the United States are appropriate, unless specifically indicated otherwise. Drugslib.com's drug information does not endorse drugs, diagnose patients or recommend therapy. Drugslib.com's drug information is an informational resource designed to assist licensed healthcare practitioners in caring for their patients and/or to serve consumers viewing this service as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, the expertise, skill, knowledge and judgment of healthcare practitioners.

The absence of a warning for a given drug or drug combination in no way should be construed to indicate that the drug or drug combination is safe, effective or appropriate for any given patient. Drugslib.com does not assume any responsibility for any aspect of healthcare administered with the aid of information Drugslib.com provides. The information contained herein is not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. If you have questions about the drugs you are taking, check with your doctor, nurse or pharmacist.

Popular Keywords